Termplan, Inc. v. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Termplan, Inc. v. Dorsey

232 S.E.2d 402, 141 Ga. App. 47, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1755

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 18, 1977

Docket53203

StatusPublished

This text of 232 S.E.2d 402 (Termplan, Inc. v. Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Termplan, Inc. v. Dorsey, 232 S.E.2d 402, 141 Ga. App. 47, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1755 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. The motion to dismiss is denied. Code Ann. § 6-809 (b).

2. On the trial of an issue of non est factum, very slight evidence of the execution of the paper is sufficient to justify submission of the question to the trier of fact. Emory v. Smith, 54 Ga. 273. However, after the introduction of some proof of the execution, the issue made under the plea must be determined by the trier of fact according to the preponderance of the evidence. [48]*48Steiner v. Blair, 38 Ga. App. 753, 754 (145 SE 471). The trial judge did not err in allowing the instrument into evidence. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial judge’s finding that "the plaintiff has not carried the burden of proof required by law as to the signing and execution of the note upon which the above action is brought.” Bank of Norwood v. Chapman, 19 Ga. App. 709 (6) (92 SE 225).

Submitted January 6, 1977 Decided January 18, 1977. Richard V. Karlberg, Jr., for appellant. Albert A. Roberts, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. The motion to dismiss is denied. Code Ann. § 6-809 (b).

2. On the trial of an issue of non est factum, very slight evidence of the execution of the paper is sufficient to justify submission of the question to the trier of fact. Emory v. Smith, 54 Ga. 273. However, after the introduction of some proof of the execution, the issue made under the plea must be determined by the trier of fact according to the preponderance of the evidence. [48]*48Steiner v. Blair, 38 Ga. App. 753, 754 (145 SE 471). The trial judge did not err in allowing the instrument into evidence. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial judge’s finding that "the plaintiff has not carried the burden of proof required by law as to the signing and execution of the note upon which the above action is brought.” Bank of Norwood v. Chapman, 19 Ga. App. 709 (6) (92 SE 225).

Submitted January 6, 1977 Decided January 18, 1977. Richard V. Karlberg, Jr., for appellant. Albert A. Roberts, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 S.E.2d 402, 141 Ga. App. 47, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/termplan-inc-v-dorsey-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack