Termotto v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Termotto v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

254 A.D. 893, 5 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 893 (Termotto v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Termotto v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 254 A.D. 893, 5 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries the defendant admitted liability but contended that the injuries received were in fact slight. The principal injury complained of was a defect in field vision of the right eye, claimed to be a result of the accident, which was not apparently discovered until the morning of the trial. The jury appear to have rejected the evidence on this subject, and rendered a verdict for the injured plaintiff in the sum of $200 and for the father, for medical expenses and loss of services, in the sum of fifty dollars. The plaintiffs, in appealing, claim that the verdict in favor of the injured plaintiff was inadequate. Judgment, in so far as appeal is taken therefrom, and order denying new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — 'Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries the defendant admitted liability but contended that the injuries received were in fact slight. The principal injury complained of was a defect in field vision of the right eye, claimed to be a result of the accident, which was not apparently discovered until the morning of the trial. The jury appear to have rejected the evidence on this subject, and rendered a verdict for the injured plaintiff in the sum of $200 and for the father, for medical expenses and loss of services, in the sum of fifty dollars. The plaintiffs, in appealing, claim that the verdict in favor of the injured plaintiff was inadequate. Judgment, in so far as appeal is taken therefrom, and order denying new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — 'Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 893, 5 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/termotto-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1938.