Terlizzi v. Marsh

154 N.E. 754, 258 Mass. 156
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 5, 1927·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Wait, J.

There was evidence from which the jury could find that the defendant invited a number of school children to ride upon his automobile, and encouraged and permitted [157]*157the plaintiff, a little girl of seven and one half years, to stand upon the running board; that as he was turning his machine upon the rough roadway at an excessive speed, the plaintiff was thrown from the running board and injured. The terms of the invitation, the speed of the turn, the cause of the fall, were in controversy. Manifestly, the determination of the plaintiff’s care and of the defendant’s gross negligence were for the jury. The judge was right in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. The case is covered by the principles laid down in Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487. It is distinguishable from decisions like Marcienowski v. Sanders, 252 Mass. 65, and Burke v. Cook, 246 Mass. 518.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terlizzi v. Marsh, 154 N.E. 754, 258 Mass. 156 (Mass. 1927).

154 N.E. 754 (Terlizzi v. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welts v. Caldwell
120 N.E.2d 280 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1954)
Hanlon v. White Fuel Corp.
104 N.E.2d 424 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1952)
Thomas v. Fritz
63 N.E.2d 357 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Kilmain v. D'Urbano
16 N.E.2d 659 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Swistak v. Paradis
192 N.E. 920 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Byrne v. Daley
192 N.E. 201 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Swengil v. Martin
252 N.W. 207 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1933)
Shaw, Admr. v. Moore
163 A. 372 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1932)
Balian v. Ogassin
179 N.E. 232 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Rosenhoff v. Schaul
157 S.E. 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Sorrell v. White
153 A. 359 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1931)
Parker v. Moody
174 N.E. 189 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Cook v. Cole
174 N.E. 271 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Rog v. Eltis
269 Mass. 466 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Smith v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
165 N.E. 393 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Bank v. Satran
266 Mass. 253 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)