Terlecki v. Straus
92 A. 1087, 86 N.J.L. 708, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 333
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Jnstice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh,' Black, Bogert, Vre-DBNBURGH, HePI’BNHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Terlecki v. Straus, 92 A. 1087, 86 N.J.L. 708, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 333 (N.J. 1914).
92 A. 1087 (Terlecki v. Straus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian Church
96 A.2d 401 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Fenton v. Margate Bridge Co.
94 A.2d 848 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)