Terhune v. Myers (Order Certifying Ballot Title)
This text of Terhune v. Myers (Order Certifying Ballot Title) (Terhune v. Myers (Order Certifying Ballot Title)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS
BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED
March 21, 2006
Carley v. Myers (S53114). Petitioners' request for oral argument is denied. Petitioners' arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 104 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure, recons allowed, 340 Or 356, 132 P3d 657 (2006).
Littleton-Stoltz v. Myers (S53183). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 135 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure.
Terhune v. Myers (S53178). Petitioners' request for oral argument is denied. Petitioners' arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 131 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terhune v. Myers (Order Certifying Ballot Title), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terhune-v-myers-order-certifying-ballot-title-or-2006.