Terex Utilities, Inc. D/B/A Terex Services, Inc. v. Robert Fondren, Jr., Et Ux, Teresa Fondren, and Dwayne Proetel
This text of Terex Utilities, Inc. D/B/A Terex Services, Inc. v. Robert Fondren, Jr., Et Ux, Teresa Fondren, and Dwayne Proetel (Terex Utilities, Inc. D/B/A Terex Services, Inc. v. Robert Fondren, Jr., Et Ux, Teresa Fondren, and Dwayne Proetel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
TEREX UTILITIES, INC. d/b/a TEREX § SERVICES, INC., No. 08-23-00131-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 166th Judicial District Court § of Bexar County, Texas ROBERT FONDREN, JR. ET UX, § TERESA FONDREN, and DWAYNE (TC# 2019-CI-12737) PROETEL, § Appellees.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before this Court is Appellant’s agreed motion to dismiss, which it filed pursuant to Texas
Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). The motion states that the parties have entered into a
settlement agreement settling the dispute underlying this appeal. Pursuant to that agreement, the
parties agreed to file a motion to dismiss the appeal. Additionally, the parties agreed that each side
would bear their respective attorney’s fees and costs incurred.
Rule 42.1 provides the actions a court may take to dispose of an appeal on the motion of
appellant or by agreement. On appellant’s motion, this Court may dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App.
P. 42.1(a)(1). On the other hand, when parties file an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys, the court may: “(A) render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement; (B) set aside
the trial court’s judgement without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for
rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement; or (C) abate the appeal and permit
proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.” Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A)–(C).
Appellant’s agreed motion to dismiss expressly states it is based on Rule 42.1 (a)(1). No
agreement signed by the parties, or their attorneys, has been filed with the clerk as contemplated
by Rule 42.1 (a)(2). We construe the agreed motion as appellant’s motion to dismiss. The motion
is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1) (allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal on the
motion of appellant). Costs of the appeal are taxed such that each party bears its own costs. Tex. R.
App. P. 42.1(d).
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
August 16, 2024
Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terex Utilities, Inc. D/B/A Terex Services, Inc. v. Robert Fondren, Jr., Et Ux, Teresa Fondren, and Dwayne Proetel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terex-utilities-inc-dba-terex-services-inc-v-robert-fondren-jr-et-texapp-2024.