Tereso Cipriano-Chacon v. William Barr
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 19-2453
Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted: January 14, 2020 Filed: January 17, 2020
[Unpublished]
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied his application for cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to prove that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We have no jurisdiction to review this discretionary
determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I); Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir. 2007). As Cipriano-Chacon has not raised a cognizable constitutional or legal challenge to that determination, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Perez v. Holder, 569 F.3d 370, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tereso Cipriano-Chacon v. William Barr (Tereso Cipriano-Chacon v. William Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.