Teresita Moral Borja v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tomas Tabisula Briones v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 150 F.3d 1223 (Teresita Moral Borja v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tomas Tabisula Briones v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
150 F.3d 1223
Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Tomas Tabisula BRIONES, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 97-70272, 97-70321.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 24, 1998.
ORDER
HUG, Chief Judge.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinions in Borja v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 139 F.3d 1251 (9th Cir.1998) and Briones v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 139 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir.1998) are withdrawn.
These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 F.3d 1223, 98 Daily Journal DAR 9090, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9564, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teresita-moral-borja-v-immigration-and-naturalizat-ca9-1998.