Teresi v. Teresi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Teresi v. Teresi

160 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5489, 2015 WL 1650593

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-3239

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 3d 953 (Teresi v. Teresi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teresi v. Teresi, 160 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5489, 2015 WL 1650593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the former husband, raises six issues in this appeal from a supplemental final judgment in a dissolution proceeding. Appellee, the former wife, concedes that the trial court erred in ordering her to pay retroactive child support for the parties’ remaining minor child only through July 2011 when the child turned 18 because the child did not graduate from high school until June 2012. See §§ 61.13(l)(a)l.a., 743.07(2), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, on that issue, we reverse and remand for recalculation of the amount the former wife owed the former husband for retroactive child support through June 2012. On all of the other issues raised by the former husband, we affirm without discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the former husband, raises six issues in this appeal from a supplemental final judgment in a dissolution proceeding. Appellee, the former wife, concedes that the trial court erred in ordering her to pay retroactive child support for the parties’ remaining minor child only through July 2011 when the child turned 18 because the child did not graduate from high school until June 2012. See §§ 61.13(l)(a)l.a., 743.07(2), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, on that issue, we reverse and remand for recalculation of the amount the former wife owed the former husband for retroactive child support through June 2012. On all of the other issues raised by the former husband, we affirm without discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5489, 2015 WL 1650593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teresi-v-teresi-fladistctapp-2015.