Teresa Watson v. SW Bell Telephone

Eighth Circuit

Teresa Watson v. SW Bell Telephone

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 1999

Docket99-1547

StatusUnpublished

This text of Teresa Watson v. SW Bell Telephone (Teresa Watson v. SW Bell Telephone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teresa Watson v. SW Bell Telephone, (8th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 99-1547EM _____________

Teresa Watson, * * Appellant, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Eastern District * of Missouri. Southwestern Bell Telephone * Company, * [Not to be Published] * Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: December 3, 1999 Filed: December 27, 1999 ___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Teresa Watson appeals from the District Court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After de novo review, see Lynn v. Deaconess Med. Ctr.-W. Campus, 160 F.3d 484, 486 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review for summary judgment); Cole v. Control Data Corp., 947 F.2d 313, 315 (8th Cir. 1991) (standard of review for state claim), we conclude the District Court’s

1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. judgment was proper for the reasons stated in the Court’s thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI