Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 2015
Docket11-16401
StatusPublished

This text of Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis (Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis, (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERESA SHEEHAN, No. 11-16401 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:09-cv-03889- CRB CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; HEATHER FONG, in her capacity as ORDER Chief of Police for the City and County of San Francisco; KIMBERLY REYNOLDS, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco; KATHERINE HOLDER, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 14, 2015

Before: John T. Noonan, Susan P. Graber and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges. 2 SHEEHAN V. CITY & CNTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

ORDER

In our previous opinion, Sheehan v. City & County of San Francisco, 743 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2014), we affirmed in part and vacated in part the judgment of the district court. In City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, 135 S. Ct. 1765 (2015), the Supreme Court reversed our judgment in part and remanded to this court for further proceedings. Under these decisions, the district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants on Sheehan’s Fourth Amendment claims but, as explained in Parts III and IV of our previous opinion, erred by granting summary judgment to the defendants on Sheehan’s Americans with Disabilities Act and state law claims. We therefore affirm in part and vacate in part the judgment of the district court and remand to the district court for further proceedings. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan
575 U.S. 600 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis
743 F.3d 1211 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teresa-sheehan-v-city-and-county-of-san-francis-ca9-2015.