Teresa Hollis v. Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company
This text of Teresa Hollis v. Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company (Teresa Hollis v. Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ November 01, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14A0018. TERESA HOLLIS v. ARGONAUT GREAT CENTRAL INSURANCE COMPANY.
Teresa Hollis filed this appeal from the trial court’s order overruling her traverse in this garnishment action. The appellee filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Hollis was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain appellate review of the trial court’s order. The appellee is correct. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4), appeals in garnishment cases must be made by filing a timely application for discretionary appeal. See Lamb v. First Union Brokerage Svcs., 263 Ga. App. 733, 736 (1) (589 SE2d 300) (2003). Because Hollis failed to follow the proper appellate procedure, we lack jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order. See Thomas v. Grisson, 191 Ga. App. 421 (383 SE2d 907) (1989). In response to the appellee’s motion to dismiss, Hollis filed a “Motion to Amend,” asking us to accept her appellate brief as an application for discretionary appeal. She cites no authority in support of her request, and we decline to construe a filing in a pending direct appeal as an application for appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35. Accordingly, Hollis’s Motion to Amend is hereby DENIED.1
1 Even if we were to construe Hollis’s brief as an application for discretionary appeal, it would be untimely. An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5- 6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). The trial court entered its order on For these reasons, the appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 11/01/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
April 16, 2013. Hollis filed her brief on September 3, which was 140 days later, and she did not file her motion to amend until September 27, which was 164 days later.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Teresa Hollis v. Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teresa-hollis-v-argonaut-great-central-insurance-company-gactapp-2013.