Teresa Fedje v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

319 F.3d 1048, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3298, 2003 WL 397903
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2003·No. 02-2322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a hearing, an administrative law judge denied Teresa Fedje’s application for disability insurance benefits, finding that the Commissioner of Social Security had met her burden to prove that Fedje could perform jobs that exist in significant numbers in the national economy. The Appeals Council denied further review, and the district court 1 granted summary judgment to the Commissioner.

After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree with the district court that substantial evidence supports the denial of benefits. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teresa Fedje v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 319 F.3d 1048, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3298, 2003 WL 397903 (8th Cir. 2003).

319 F.3d 1048 (Teresa Fedje v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related