Terence Tribble v. Nicholas Evangel

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Terence Tribble v. Nicholas Evangel. Read the opinion of the Court — 670 F.3d 753
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 2, 2012·No. 10-3262·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 2, 2012

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

JANE E. MAGNUS‐STINSON, District Judge*

No. 10‐3262

TERENCE TRIBBLE, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff‐Appellant, District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern v. Division.

NICHOLAS J. EVANGELIDES and ROGER No. 08 C 2533 L. FIESER, Defendants‐Appellees. William J. Hibbler, Judge.

O R D E R

On motion of the defendants‐appellees to correct the opinion in this case issued on January 26, 2012, it is amended as follows:

The sentence at slip opinion, page 2, lines 23‐27, that originally read “The defense, in response, rather than objecting to the relevance of or prejudice from such evidence, wanted to explain why that conclusion didn’t mean that the officers didn’t actually find drugs on Tribble.” is changed to “After losing a motion in limine to prevent admission of the state judge’s ruling, the defense wanted to explain why that conclusion didn’t mean that the officers didn’t actually find drugs on Tribble.”

The motion to correct is otherwise denied.

* The Honorable Jane E. Magnus‐Stinson, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terence Tribble v. Nicholas Evangel, (7th Cir. 2012).

Terence Tribble v. Nicholas Evangel (Terence Tribble v. Nicholas Evangel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.