Terence Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Terence Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 F.4th 1264
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2023·No. 18-56414·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUG 4 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS TERENCE B. TEKOH, No. 18-56414

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-07297-GW-SK v. Central District of California, Los Angeles COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DENNIS STANGELAND, Sergeant; CARLOS ORDER VEGA, Deputy,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DOES, 1 to 10,

Defendants.

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and WARDLAW and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Appellees’ motion to file a reply to Appellant’s response to the petition for

panel rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. 85) is DENIED.

Pursuant to Circuit Rule 36-2(f), the memorandum disposition filed May 11,

2023, (Dkt. 78) is designated for publication. The superseding published

disposition is filed concurrently with this order. Because the text of the published

disposition remains unchanged from the previously filed memorandum disposition,

further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will not be permitted. Appellees’ already-filed petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. 82)

remains pending.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terence Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles, (9th Cir. 2023).

Terence Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles (Terence Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.