Terence S. Chancellor v. Select Portfolio Servicing

869 F.3d 506, 2017 WL 3048553, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13018

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
• Decided: July 19, 2017
• Docket: 16-2475
• Status: Published

Opinion

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff reached an oral agreement to settle a litigation arising out of a home mortgage loan to him, but the defendants insisted that as part of the settlement he would have to release any claims he had against another bank, and also a trust company, neither of which had been a party to the litigation. Although the district judge agreed with the defendants’ position, it hasn’t been proved that anyone had told the plaintiff during the settlement conference that by agreeing to the settlement he would also be releasing any claim he might have against the two nonparties to the litigation. Because there was no evidentia-ry proceeding, there was no basis for the judge’s deciding that the plaintiff had agreed to release the claims against the nonparties. The judgment must therefore be vacated and the case remanded for a factual inquiry into the parties’ disagreement.