Terence Gregory v. Albert Punchard

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 8, 2023
Docket14-23-00247-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Terence Gregory v. Albert Punchard (Terence Gregory v. Albert Punchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terence Gregory v. Albert Punchard, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 8, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00247-CV

TERENCE GREGORY, Appellant

V. ALBERT PUNCHARD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court1 Lee County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 3494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, proceeding pro se, is attempting to appeal the jury’s verdict. Our record does not contain a judgment on that verdict. On April 25, 2023, we issued

1 The Supreme Court of Texas ordered the Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas to transfer this appeal (No. 03-23-00165-CV) to this court. Misc. Docket No. 23-9017 (Tex. March 21, 2023); see Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §§ 73.001, .002. Because of the transfer, we decide the case in accordance with the precedent of the transferor court under principles of stare decisis if our decision otherwise would have been inconsistent with the transferor court's precedent. See Tex. R. App. 41.3. an order to trial court clerk to provide this court with a copy of the final judgment. The trial court clerk informed this court that “no final judgment has been filed.”

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). There is no judgment or appealable interlocutory order in the underlying proceeding from which appellant may appeal. Absent a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, we lack subject-matter jurisdiction to decide this appeal.

On May 10, 2023, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before May 22, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Terence Gregory v. Albert Punchard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terence-gregory-v-albert-punchard-texapp-2023.