Tereau v. Meeds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Tereau v. Meeds

130 N.W. 3, 114 Minn. 517, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1149

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 24, 1911

DocketNos. 16,790 — (142)

StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.W. 3 (Tereau v. Meeds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tereau v. Meeds, 130 N.W. 3, 114 Minn. 517, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1149 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is substantially identical with Ward v. Meeds, supra, page 18, 130 N. W. 2, and the same conclusion is reached. There was no error in submitting to the jury the question whether the plaintiff and Brills, the driver of the vehicle, were engaged in a joint enterprise. Tile evidence made the question one of fact. The question of Brills’ contributory negligence was also one for the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is substantially identical with Ward v. Meeds, supra, page 18, 130 N. W. 2, and the same conclusion is reached. There was no error in submitting to the jury the question whether the plaintiff and Brills, the driver of the vehicle, were engaged in a joint enterprise. Tile evidence made the question one of fact. The question of Brills’ contributory negligence was also one for the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.W. 3, 114 Minn. 517, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tereau-v-meeds-minn-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack