Terbell v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
This text of 71 F.2d 1017 (Terbell v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gladys G. TERBELL, Joseph B. Terbell, Jr., and Thomas G. Terbell, as Executors of the Estate of Joseph B. Terbell, Deceased, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Breed, Abbott & Morgan, of New York City (John B. Nash and Paul L. Peyton, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners.
Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and John MacC. Hudson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Bonwit, Teller & Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 53 F.(2d) 381, 82 A. L. R. 325, Bedell v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 30 F.(2d) 622, and Central Bank Block Ass'n v. Commissioner, 57 F.(2d) 5 (C. C. A. 5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 F.2d 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terbell-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca2-1934.