Teramine v. Shuttleworth

151 F.2d 602
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1945
DocketNo. 10033
StatusPublished

This text of 151 F.2d 602 (Teramine v. Shuttleworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teramine v. Shuttleworth, 151 F.2d 602 (6th Cir. 1945).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel ;

And it appearing that the appellant is in confinement at the Federal Correctional Institution at Milan, Michigan, by virtue of a valid sentence of imprisonment in a penitentiary for the term of two years beginning on the date on which he was received at the penitentiary for service of such sentence;

And it appearing that this sentence, imposed May 25, 1942, was to run consecutively with a previous sentence imposed November 20, 1934:

And it appearing that the sentence under the prior conviction was not fully executed until November 9, 1944:

It is ordered that the order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and it hereby is, affirmed. Cf. Tippit v. Squier, 9 Cir., 145 F.2d 211.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tippitt v. Squier
145 F.2d 211 (Ninth Circuit, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 F.2d 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teramine-v-shuttleworth-ca6-1945.