Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ter Maat v. Ter Maat

Ter Maat v. Ter Maat

133 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 895665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 7, 2014
DocketNo. 1D13-4998
StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 3d 631 (Ter Maat v. Ter Maat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ter Maat v. Ter Maat, 133 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 895665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding respondent’s concession to be well-taken, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, the order granting the motion to strike the notice of dismissal is quashed, and the cause is remanded with [632]*632directions to dismiss the action pending below. See Service Experts, LLC v. Northside Air Conditioning & Electrical Service, Inc., 56 So.3d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Service Experts, LLC v. Northside Air Conditioning & Electrical Service, Inc.
56 So. 3d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 895665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ter-maat-v-ter-maat-fladistctapp-2014.