Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ter Maat v. Ter Maat

Ter Maat v. Ter Maat

133 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 895665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2014·No. No. 1D13-4998·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding respondent’s concession to be well-taken, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, the order granting the motion to strike the notice of dismissal is quashed, and the cause is remanded with [632]*632directions to dismiss the action pending below. See Service Experts, LLC v. Northside Air Conditioning & Electrical Service, Inc., 56 So.3d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ter Maat v. Ter Maat, 133 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 895665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

133 So. 3d 631 (Ter Maat v. Ter Maat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Service Experts, LLC v. Northside Air Conditioning & Electrical Service, Inc.
56 So. 3d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)