TEQUAN RAHEEM FREEMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of TEQUAN RAHEEM FREEMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (TEQUAN RAHEEM FREEMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
TEQUAN RAHEEM FREEMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-2759
[July 14, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2008-CF-003219A.
Marie-Louise Parmer of Parmer Deliberato, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
TEQUAN RAHEEM FREEMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tequan-raheem-freeman-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.