Tepper v. Tannenbaum
This text of 67 A.D.2d 882 (Tepper v. Tannenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to reargue or to appeal is denied, without costs. Since the order sought to be appealed directed a new trial, an appeal to the Court of Appeals may only be taken as of right by stipulating for judgment absolute (CPLR 5601, subd [c]; New York Cent & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co. v State of New York, 166 NY 286; United Nat. Bank v Ettinger, 60 AD2d 670; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5602.09, pp 56-72). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Markewich, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.D.2d 882, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tepper-v-tannenbaum-nyappdiv-1979.