Tepper v. Tannenbaum
67 A.D.2d 882, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tepper v. Tannenbaum. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.2d 541 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1979·Published
Opinion
Motion for leave to reargue or to appeal is denied, without costs. Since the order sought to be appealed directed a new trial, an appeal to the Court of Appeals may only be taken as of right by stipulating for judgment absolute (CPLR 5601, subd [c]; New York Cent & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co. v State of New York, 166 NY 286; United Nat. Bank v Ettinger, 60 AD2d 670; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5602.09, pp 56-72). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Markewich, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tepper v. Tannenbaum, 67 A.D.2d 882, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).
67 A.D.2d 882 (Tepper v. Tannenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United National Bank v. Ettinger
60 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)