Tepos-Perez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 449 F.2d 1290 (Tepos-Perez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1291]*1291On this appeal from the granting of a temporary injunction, it appears from colloquy of counsel that there have been changes of circumstances which might or might not be material to the continuance of the temporary injunction.
We find this problem with the temporary injunction: It has sort of an open end which puts the duration of the order, for practical purposes, out of the court’s control.
The case is remanded to the district court to consider any intervening events. If it believes that there should still be a temporary injunction, the old one should be vacated and a new one entered. If such course is followed, a new appeal, of course, could be taken and someone should move to expedite.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 F.2d 1290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tepos-perez-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-1971.