Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Teplitzky v. Lippman

Teplitzky v. Lippman

143 Misc. 244, 256 N.Y.S. 410, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 961
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 Misc. 244 (Teplitzky v. Lippman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teplitzky v. Lippman, 143 Misc. 244, 256 N.Y.S. 410, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. (Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 App. Div. 714.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler andUntermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. American Sales Book Co.
16 F. Supp. 189 (W.D. New York, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 Misc. 244, 256 N.Y.S. 410, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teplitzky-v-lippman-nyappterm-1932.