Teodoro v. Teodoro

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Teodoro v. Teodoro

246 So. 3d 565

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2018

DocketNo. 3D17–830

StatusPublished

This text of 246 So. 3d 565 (Teodoro v. Teodoro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teodoro v. Teodoro, 246 So. 3d 565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Watt v. Watt, 966 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("Shared parental responsibility assumes that the parties can come to agreement on the welfare of their children. Where the parties cannot and will not come to agreement, the trial court can determine that such an impasse constitutes a substantial change in circumstance, requiring modification of the final judgment in the best interest of the children. Because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's determinations in this case, we affirm the final judgment of modification.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Watt v. Watt, 966 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("Shared parental responsibility assumes that the parties can come to agreement on the welfare of their children. Where the parties cannot and will not come to agreement, the trial court can determine that such an impasse constitutes a substantial change in circumstance, requiring modification of the final judgment in the best interest of the children. Because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's determinations in this case, we affirm the final judgment of modification.").

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 So. 3d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teodoro-v-teodoro-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack