Teodorescu v. Resnick & Binder, P.C.
925 N.E.2d 581, 14 N.Y.3d 776, 898 N.Y.S.2d 543
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied. We hold, contrary to the Appellate Division, that plaintiff raised issues of fact regarding whether she could have prevailed on a theory of constructive notice.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Teodorescu v. Resnick & Binder, P.C., 925 N.E.2d 581, 14 N.Y.3d 776, 898 N.Y.S.2d 543 (N.Y. 2010).
925 N.E.2d 581 (Teodorescu v. Resnick & Binder, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Teodorescu v. Resnick & Binder, P.C.
29 Misc. 3d 1119 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Washington v. Washington
925 N.E.2d 582 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)