Teo v. Siatafu

High Court of American Samoa

Teo v. Siatafu

1 Am. Samoa 327

CourtHigh Court of American Samoa

DecidedDecember 23, 1921

DocketNo. 4-1915

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Am. Samoa 327 (Teo v. Siatafu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering High Court of American Samoa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teo v. Siatafu, 1 Am. Samoa 327 (amsamoa 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This cause coming on to be heard before Sydney D. Hall, Associate Judge of the High Court of American Samoa, and being heard and it appearing to the court that the matters in controversy had been amicably settled between the parties plaintiff and defendant, and it is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that this action be dismissed, and “Laumaala” has been amicably divided among those named.

It is further ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action $10.00.

Given under my hand and seal of the High Court of American Samoa this 23rd day of December, 1921.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This cause coming on to be heard before Sydney D. Hall, Associate Judge of the High Court of American Samoa, and being heard and it appearing to the court that the matters in controversy had been amicably settled between the parties plaintiff and defendant, and it is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that this action be dismissed, and “Laumaala” has been amicably divided among those named.

It is further ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action $10.00.

Given under my hand and seal of the High Court of American Samoa this 23rd day of December, 1921.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Am. Samoa 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teo-v-siatafu-amsamoa-1921.