Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley
369 F.2d 699
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1966
DocketNo. 100, Docket 30338
StatusPublished
This text of 369 F.2d 699 (Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley, 369 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1966).
Opinion
We affirm Judge Dooling’s finding that Tensitron’s tension meter was “obvious” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103 and therefore not patentable. His well reasoned opinion is reported at 260 F.Supp. 457 (1966). It is unnecessary, therefore, for us to pass upon his finding that Bromley’s device infringed claims 2, 3, 5, and 6 of Tensitron’s patent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley
260 F. Supp. 457 (E.D. New York, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
369 F.2d 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tensitron-inc-v-bromley-ca2-1966.