Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley
369 F.2d 699
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 3, 1966·No. No. 100, Docket 30338·Published
Opinion
We affirm Judge Dooling’s finding that Tensitron’s tension meter was “obvious” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103 and therefore not patentable. His well reasoned opinion is reported at 260 F.Supp. 457 (1966). It is unnecessary, therefore, for us to pass upon his finding that Bromley’s device infringed claims 2, 3, 5, and 6 of Tensitron’s patent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley, 369 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1966).
369 F.2d 699 (Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley
260 F. Supp. 457 (E.D. New York, 1966)