Tensaw Land Timber Co., Inc. v. Stoddard

404 So. 2d 598, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3763
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 4, 1981·No. 80-396·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the first appeal of this case, the judgment in favor of the adverse possession claimant (Tensaw Land & Timber Company, Inc.) was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Company, Inc., 390 So.2d 616 (Ala.1980). Upon retrial, a judgment was entered in favor of the record title holder (Robert Kerlin). Our thorough review of the record, assisted by our study of the excellent briefs of counsel, constrains us to hold that the evidentiary deficiency noted on the first appeal has not been overcome; and the heavy burden which the law casts upon an adverse possession claimant to prove his case through the principle of tacking has not been met.

AFFIRMED.

AH the Justices concur except ADAMS, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tensaw Land Timber Co., Inc. v. Stoddard, 404 So. 2d 598, 1981 Ala. LEXIS 3763 (Ala. 1981).

404 So. 2d 598 (Tensaw Land Timber Co., Inc. v. Stoddard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.
390 So. 2d 616 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1980)