Tenny v. Densley

District of Columbia

Tenny v. Densley

1 D.C. 314

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJune 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 314 (Tenny v. Densley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tenny v. Densley, 1 D.C. 314 (D.D.C. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Ca. sa. for costs on verdict at December term, 1805, for defendant, Tenny. On the 30th of September, 1805, Densley had been .discharged under the Insolvent Law of 1803, [2 Stat. at Large, 237,] by the 10th section of which, he is to- be discharged if taken on any process or any judgment for any debt, damages, or costs contracted, owing or growing due before his discharge. Part of these costs were growing due or were contracted before his discharge. The defendant, Densley, was discharged by the Coukt on that ground.

(Duckett, J., absent.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ca. sa. for costs on verdict at December term, 1805, for defendant, Tenny. On the 30th of September, 1805, Densley had been .discharged under the Insolvent Law of 1803, [2 Stat. at Large, 237,] by the 10th section of which, he is to- be discharged if taken on any process or any judgment for any debt, damages, or costs contracted, owing or growing due before his discharge. Part of these costs were growing due or were contracted before his discharge. The defendant, Densley, was discharged by the Coukt on that ground.

(Duckett, J., absent.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tenny-v-densley-dcd-1806.