Tenny v. Densley
This text of 23 F. Cas. 849 (Tenny v. Densley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ca. sa. [by Tenny against Densley Burford] for costs on verdict at December term, 1805, for defendant, Tenny. On the 30th of September, 1805, Densley had been discharged under the insolvent Ihw of 1803 (2 Stat. 237), by the 10th section of which, he is to be discharged if taken on any process or any judgment for any debt, damages, or costs contracted, owing or growing due beiore his discharge. Part of these costs were growing due or were contracted before his discharge. The defendant, Dens-ley, was discharged by the court on that ground. (DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. Cas. 849, 1 Cranch 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tenny-v-densley-circtddc-1806.