Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco

Ninth Circuit

Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco

294 F. App'x 285

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 22, 2008·No. Nos. 06-15260, 06-15426·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Appellee Antoine Goffs Motion to Dismiss Claim Against George Butterworth, for Entry of Judgment in Butterworth’s Favor, and for Resubmission of Pending Appeals is GRANTED.

These cases are resubmitted for decision as of the filed date of this Order.

Butterworth’s appeal is dismissed and his case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of entering judgment in Goffs lawsuit against Butterworth in Butterworth’s favor. No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellee Antoine Goffs Motion to Dismiss Claim Against George Butterworth, for Entry of Judgment in Butterworth’s Favor, and for Resubmission of Pending Appeals is GRANTED.

These cases are resubmitted for decision as of the filed date of this Order.

Butterworth’s appeal is dismissed and his case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of entering judgment in Goffs lawsuit against Butterworth in Butterworth’s favor. No costs.

Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco, 294 F. App'x 285 (9th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

294 F. App'x 285 (Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.