Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co.
136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 156, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 834
Opinion
The decision of the vital issue in this ease is controlled by the ruling in the first headnote and subdivision thereof, in the case of Continental Trust Co. v. Bank of Harrison, 36 Ga. App. 149 (134 S. E. 775). See Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co., 162 Ga. 766 (134 S. E. 778). Though the judgment in the Bank of Harrison case, supra, is affirmed by this court, the judgment in the present case, because of a different verdict having been rendered in the trial court, is
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co., 136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 156, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 834 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
136 S.E. 323 (Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Trust Co. v. Tennille Banking Co.
146 S.E. 566 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)