Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co.

136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 156, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 834
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1926
Docket16295
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.E. 323 (Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co., 136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 156, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 834 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The decision of the vital issue in this ease is controlled by the ruling in the first headnote and subdivision thereof, in the case of Continental Trust Co. v. Bank of Harrison, 36 Ga. App. 149 (134 S. E. 775). See Tennille Banking Co. v. Continental Trust Co., 162 Ga. 766 (134 S. E. 778). Though the judgment in the Bank of Harrison case, supra, is affirmed by this court, the judgment in the present case, because of a different verdict having been rendered in the trial court, is

Reversed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Trust Co. v. Tennille Banking Co.
146 S.E. 566 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 323, 36 Ga. App. 156, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennille-banking-co-v-continental-trust-co-gactapp-1926.