Tennile v. Walshe & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Tennile v. Walshe & Co.

81 Ala. 160

DecidedDecember 15, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 81 Ala. 160 (Tennile v. Walshe & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tennile v. Walshe & Co., 81 Ala. 160 (Ala. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

— The record fails to show that the appellant reserved any exception to either of the rulings of [161]*161the court in giving or refusing to give the several charges, which are made the basis of the assignments of error contended for by appellant’s counsel. We can not know, or assume that such exceptions were reserved, but the contrary must be presumed in support of the judgment of the court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SOMERVILLE, J.

— The record fails to show that the appellant reserved any exception to either of the rulings of [161]*161the court in giving or refusing to give the several charges, which are made the basis of the assignments of error contended for by appellant’s counsel. We can not know, or assume that such exceptions were reserved, but the contrary must be presumed in support of the judgment of the court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 Ala. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennile-v-walshe-co-ala-1886.