Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Tenney v. General Electric Co.

Tenney v. General Electric Co.

887 N.E.2d 349, 118 Ohio St. 3d 197
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 14, 2008
DocketNo. 2007-1490
StatusPublished

This text of 887 N.E.2d 349 (Tenney v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tenney v. General Electric Co., 887 N.E.2d 349, 118 Ohio St. 3d 197 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The part of the judgment of the court of appeals that reversed the judgment of the trial court is reversed on the authority of Doe v. First United Methodist Church (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 531, 629 N.E.2d 402, and Love v. Port [198]*198Clinton (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 524 N.E.2d 166. The judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

Thomas A. Sobecki, for appellant. Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P., Gregory V. Mersol, Kelly M. King, and Gil Brosky, for appellees. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Love v. City of Port Clinton
524 N.E.2d 166 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
Doe v. First United Methodist Church
629 N.E.2d 402 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
887 N.E.2d 349, 118 Ohio St. 3d 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tenney-v-general-electric-co-ohio-2008.