Tennessee & Pacific Railroad v. Rogers
Opinion
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
In this case tbe contract in controversy expressed in the bill of lading contained a clause limiting tbe liability of tbe defendant company, and providing tbat its liability shall cease upon delivery to tbe consignee or carrier over whose connecting line tbe freight was to be shipped. This provision was valid. Tbe circuit judge failed to instruct tbe jury as to tbe effect of such limitation of tbe liability of defendant, and for this error tbe judgment must be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial. Tbe cost of this appeal will be paid by defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
3 Shan. Cas. 293 (Tennessee & Pacific Railroad v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.