Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co.

42 So. 2d 101, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 601

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 20, 1949

DocketNo. 7381.

StatusPublished

This text of 42 So. 2d 101 (Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co., 42 So. 2d 101, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 601 (La. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ refused. Under facts set forth, the provisions of Act No. 325 of 1948, and Article 2634 of the Revised Civil Code are applicable, and relator's application for a suspensive appeal was properly refused.

On Rehearing Relator has filed in this Court an application for a rehearing with respect to the action of the Court in refusing writs of mandamus ordering the granting of a suspensive appeal.

We know of no authority in law or under the rules of this Court authorizing a rehearing of the action of an appellate court in refusing writs in aid of its supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, consideration of the application for rehearing is declined on the ground that the action of this Court in refusing writs was final and there is now nothing further before us for action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ refused. Under facts set forth, the provisions of Act No. 325 of 1948, and Article 2634 of the Revised Civil Code are applicable, and relator's application for a suspensive appeal was properly refused.

On Rehearing Relator has filed in this Court an application for a rehearing with respect to the action of the Court in refusing writs of mandamus ordering the granting of a suspensive appeal.

We know of no authority in law or under the rules of this Court authorizing a rehearing of the action of an appellate court in refusing writs in aid of its supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, consideration of the application for rehearing is declined on the ground that the action of this Court in refusing writs was final and there is now nothing further before us for action.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 So. 2d 101, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennessee-gas-transmission-co-v-wyatt-lumber-co-lactapp-1949.