Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Bean

283 A.D. 684, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 6, 1954·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Final order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Appellants have limited their appeal to the sole question of whether the report of the commissioners is sufficient upon its face. The report sets forth the rule of damages adopted by the commissioners and the report is clear, explicit and certain. Accordingly, the report is sufficient upon its face. The state of the record before condemnation commissioners in some proceedings may necessitate a more detailed report than that submitted in this proceeding. Inasmuch as appellants have limited their appeal to the question of the sufficiency of the report, from an examination of the report on its face, and appellants not having sought a review on the merits, no such question arises in this case. All concur. (Appeal by defendants from a final order of Seneca County Court confirming the report of the commissioners of appraisal and awarding plaintiff an easement and right of way over property owned by defendants in the towns of Junius and Waterloo, and awarding defendants damages for such right of way.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Bean, 283 A.D. 684, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

283 A.D. 684 (Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Bean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Burnside
41 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. Goodwin
34 Misc. 2d 267 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Spring Valley Water Works & Supply Co. v. Haslach
24 Misc. 2d 730 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)