Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Cotton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Cotton

116 Ala. 669

DecidedNovember 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 116 Ala. 669 (Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Cotton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Cotton, 116 Ala. 669 (Ala. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant. The cause of action, as stated, was for the value of services performed on Sundays, by the plaintiff, who was a State convict and had been leased to the de[670]*670fendant during his term of service. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. Harvey, ante, p. 656, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant. The cause of action, as stated, was for the value of services performed on Sundays, by the plaintiff, who was a State convict and had been leased to the de[670]*670fendant during his term of service. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. Harvey, ante, p. 656, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 Ala. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennessee-coal-iron-railroad-v-cotton-ala-1897.