Tennessee Central R. R. v. Reeves' Admr.
136 S.W. 870, 143 Ky. 467, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 421
This text of 136 S.W. 870 (Tennessee Central R. R. v. Reeves' Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tennessee Central R. R. v. Reeves' Admr., 136 S.W. 870, 143 Ky. 467, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 421 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
Opinion op the Coitet by
Motion sustained.
' It is incumbent on appellant to have the time for filing the' record extended when the bill of exceptions was not filed, although it was delayed by appellee. The time having expired and the record not having been filed, the appeal, nnder the statutes, must be dismissed with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hudnall v. Fleenor
189 S.W.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1945)
Lion Coal Co. v. Contas
291 P. 314 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)
Wermeling v. Wermeling
224 Ky. 107 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1928)
Wermeling v. Wermeling
5 S.W.2d 893 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Striger v. Carter
227 S.W. 448 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Wickliffe v. Turner
149 S.W. 833 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Blalock v. Atwood
147 S.W. 748 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 S.W. 870, 143 Ky. 467, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennessee-central-r-r-v-reeves-admr-kyctapp-1911.