Tenneco, Inc. v. Stream

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Tenneco, Inc. v. Stream

394 So. 2d 750, 1981 La. App. LEXIS 3527

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 4, 1981·No. No. 8061·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case of Tenneco, Inc. v. The Harold Stream Investment Trust et al., 394 So.2d 744 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1981) (# 8060), the judgment of the district court which dismissed, without prejudice, the expropriation suit of Tenneco, Inc. which sought a right-of-way across a tract of Cameron Parish land belonging to defendant Matilda Gray Stream, is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half to Tenneco, Inc., and one-half to Matilda Gray Stream.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case of Tenneco, Inc. v. The Harold Stream Investment Trust et al., 394 So.2d 744 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1981) (# 8060), the judgment of the district court which dismissed, without prejudice, the expropriation suit of Tenneco, Inc. which sought a right-of-way across a tract of Cameron Parish land belonging to defendant Matilda Gray Stream, is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half to Tenneco, Inc., and one-half to Matilda Gray Stream.

AFFIRMED.

Tenneco, Inc. v. Stream, 394 So. 2d 750, 1981 La. App. LEXIS 3527 (La. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

394 So. 2d 750 (Tenneco, Inc. v. Stream) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related