Tengstrand v. Addison Central School District

151 A.D.2d 968, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8276

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated at Special Term, Finnerty, J. We add only that petitioner’s contention that he is entitled to a name-clearing hearing was not raised at Special Term and thus has not been preserved for appellate review (see, Tumolillo v Tumolillo, 51 NY2d 790; Arvantides v Arvantides, 106 AD2d 853, mod 64 NY2d 1033). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Finnerty, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tengstrand v. Addison Central School District, 151 A.D.2d 968, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

151 A.D.2d 968 (Tengstrand v. Addison Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tumolillo v. Tumolillo
412 N.E.2d 1315 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Arvantides v. Arvantides
478 N.E.2d 199 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Arvantides v. Arvantides
106 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)