Tenement House Department v. Atlantic Realty Co.

121 N.Y.S. 229
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.Y.S. 229 (Tenement House Department v. Atlantic Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tenement House Department v. Atlantic Realty Co., 121 N.Y.S. 229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This appeal is taken.pursuant to the provisions of section 311 of the Municipal Court act, “where the defendant appeals-from a judgment rendered in an action wherein he did not appear, and a summons was not personally served upon him.” Respondent does not contest the appeal.

The defendant claims never to have been served with a summons, ■ and_ submits affidavits in support of its contention. The affidavits explicitly negative service of the summons upon any of the directors or officers or managing agent of the corporation. They state that they do not know who the person served as a director may be, but that he is and was not a director or otherwise connected with the company. Under such conditions, the court below acquired no jurisdiction over the defendant. Hodge v. Acorn Brass Mfg. Co., 50 Misc. Rep. 627, 98 N. Y. Supp. 673.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodge v. Acorn Brass Manufacturing Co.
50 Misc. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.Y.S. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tenement-house-department-v-atlantic-realty-co-nyappterm-1910.