Teneca Hines v. Pleasana Davison
This text of Teneca Hines v. Pleasana Davison (Teneca Hines v. Pleasana Davison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1368 _____________________________
TENECA HINES,
Appellant,
v.
PLEASANA DAVISON,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Kerra Smith, Judge.
March 18, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court’s Order dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
AFFIRMED.
BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.
Pleasana Davison, pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Teneca Hines v. Pleasana Davison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teneca-hines-v-pleasana-davison-fladistctapp-2026.