Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1367 _____________________________
TENECA HINES,
Appellant,
v.
DEBORAH GILL,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Kerra Smith, Judge.
March 18, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court’s Order dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
AFFIRMED.
BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.
Deborah Gill, pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill (Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.