Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 2026
Docket1D2025-1367
StatusPublished

This text of Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill (Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-1367 _____________________________

TENECA HINES,

Appellant,

v.

DEBORAH GILL,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Kerra Smith, Judge.

March 18, 2026

PER CURIAM.

Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court’s Order dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.

Deborah Gill, pro se, Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teneca-hines-v-deborah-gill-fladistctapp-2026.