Tendick v. Lastrapes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Tendick v. Lastrapes

28 La. Ann. 76

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1876

DocketNo. 4421

StatusPublished

This text of 28 La. Ann. 76 (Tendick v. Lastrapes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tendick v. Lastrapes, 28 La. Ann. 76 (La. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Howell, J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale, on which by the well-settled jurisprudence of this court the only question to be examined is the sufficiency of the evidence on which the judge a •■qtw issued his order.

In this case we find ample authentic evidence to warrant the writ, [77]*77consisting of an act of mortgage in clue form and a note identified therewith.

Any other matters of dispute, relating to the validity of the obligation,, the proceeding's following the issuance of the writ, etc., must be raised in another form of action.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell, J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale, on which by the well-settled jurisprudence of this court the only question to be examined is the sufficiency of the evidence on which the judge a •■qtw issued his order.

In this case we find ample authentic evidence to warrant the writ, [77]*77consisting of an act of mortgage in clue form and a note identified therewith.

Any other matters of dispute, relating to the validity of the obligation,, the proceeding's following the issuance of the writ, etc., must be raised in another form of action.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 La. Ann. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tendick-v-lastrapes-la-1876.