Tencza v. St. Elizabeth Medical Center

87 A.D.3d 1375, 930 N.Y.2d 520
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from an order in this medical malpractice action that, inter alia, denied its motion seeking to vacate a judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor pursuant to [1376]*1376CPLR 5003-a and ordered defendant to pay costs, disbursements and interest on that judgment. We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff satisfied his obligation pursuant to CPLR 5003-a by tendering a general release and stipulation of discontinuance to defendant’s attorney. The general release acknowledged the existence of a Medicare lien and provided “that a portion of the settlement will be paid to Medicare for [the] purpose[ ] of satisfying that lien.” The parties thereafter agreed that defendant was permitted to withhold only $50,000 of the settlement to satisfy the Medicare lien. “Neither CPLR 5003-a, nor the parties’ stipulation of settlement, imposed any additional requirement on the plaintiff or his attorney” (Klee v Americas Best Bottling Co., Inc., 76 AD3d 544, 546 [2010]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tencza v. St. Elizabeth Medical Center, 87 A.D.3d 1375, 930 N.Y.2d 520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

87 A.D.3d 1375 (Tencza v. St. Elizabeth Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levine v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
174 N.Y.S.3d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Torres v. Hirsch Park, LLC
91 A.D.3d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)