Tencorn v. Goldman
31 Misc. 786, 65 N.Y.S. 1147
This text of 31 Misc. 786 (Tencorn v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tencorn v. Goldman, 31 Misc. 786, 65 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
The plaintiffs having failed to make any proof of delivery of the goods, the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment which has been rendered in their favor.
Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerioh and O’Gorman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 Misc. 786, 65 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tencorn-v-goldman-nyappterm-1900.