Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Tench v. Swift & Co.

Tench v. Swift & Co.

136 S.E. 287, 36 Ga. App. 182, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 846
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1926·No. 17530·Published

Opinions

Luke, J.

Tlie sole assignment of error in the motion for a new trial being upon the usual general grounds, and there being some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tench v. Swift & Co., 136 S.E. 287, 36 Ga. App. 182, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 846 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

136 S.E. 287 (Tench v. Swift & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Randolph
59 S.E. 1110 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)